Review criteria / guide for submitted manuscripts

1. Relevance to the aim and scope of EMOTHE: Does the manuscript align with the scope and focus of the magazine?

2. Originality and significance: Does the manuscript address a novel and important question in the occupational therapy education? Does the manuscript offer new insights or perspectives that advance occupational therapy education?

3. Clarity and coherence: Is the manuscript well-written, clear, and logically organized?

4. Adherence to guidelines: Does the manuscript adhere to formatting, style, and referencing guidelines?

5. Content: Does the introduction give a clear understanding of relevant concepts, contexts, problem/issue, and aim? Are the methods described in the manuscript appropriate and well-described, and if appropriate, robust? Are results clearly presented and supported? Do the implications (and if appropriate, conclusions drawn) align with the results presented?

6. Ethical considerations: Was the research/development work conducted in accordance with ethical guidelines/practices? Are any conflicts of interest disclosed appropriately?

7. References: Are the references cited in the manuscript accurate, relevant, and appropriately used? Does the manuscript provide sufficient references to support its claims?

8. Clarity of tables and figures: Do the tables and figures enhance understanding the material? Are the tables and figures clear, well-labeled, and effectively explained?

9. Overall Quality: Does the manuscript meet the standards of excellence expected for publication in EMOTHE? Are there any areas where the manuscript could be improved to enhance its quality?